Own this racket? Tell us if our scores feel right — enough responses feed the next rescoring pass.
Power
Control
Maneuverability
Comfort
Sweet Spot
Value
PRR Score
78PRR Score
Inside the frame
What's inside
◈
Face weaveCarbon 24K
Carbon fibre weave density of the hitting face.
◉
CoreEVA
Foam core determines feel and vibration damping.
▽
ShapeRound
Head shape affects sweet spot size and balance.
⬡
SurfaceCarbon 24K
The texture of the outer face.
⊡
BalanceEven
Balance point determines power vs. control trade-off.
Our verdict
The Yarara Elite 24K 2.0 leads with its face: a genuine 24K weave over an EVA core, producing power 80 with a vivid, dense report. The rest of the card is Vibor-A doing what Vibor-A does: control 67, comfort 64 and tolerance 63 hold the brand's strictest intermediate-label terms, and weight documentation is incomplete. Value 76 is decent for the face spec. The comparison that matters: Enebe's Response 24K delivers the same face class with kinder terms for less. The Yarara's case is the brand's bite and identity; the arithmetic belongs to the rival.
The woven face is the star — a vivid, dense strike with the bite Vibor-A is known for, at a fair price for the spec. But it's harsh for a racket wearing an intermediate label: the hit is firm, forgiveness is thin, and the weight documentation is incomplete, so check the actual specimen in hand. Worth cross-shopping Enebe's Response 24K before deciding.
No player reviews yet — own it? Be the first to review the Vibora A Yarara Elite 24K 2.0.
