padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 vs Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Best
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Oxdog

Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0

87
Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft
Starvie

Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft

82
PRR verdict

Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 5 points

Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 87/100 against 82/100 for the Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft. Its biggest edge is power (+13). The Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft answers back on comfort (+7). On price, the Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft is currently €157 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft
Overall
87/100Best
82/100
Control
79
83Best
Power
83Best
70
Sweet spot
78Best
77
Maneuverability
82Best
72
Comfort
69
76Best
Specs
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft
Shape
Round
Diamond
Balance
Weight
355–380 g
Core
Soft EVA
Face material
Carbon 3K
Level
Intermediate
Advanced
Playing style
Versatile
Control
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0

The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.

287at PadelProShopReview & prices
Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft

A control-first diamond frame for advanced players, the Starvie Kenta Eternal Ultra Speed Soft 2024 pairs an EVA Ultra Speed Soft core with a Carbon 3K face to deliver a precise, forgiving feel that rewards technical players. Control scores 83, which is high for a diamond shape and reflects the racket's ability to place the ball accurately despite the head-weighted character. Power at 70 is conservative: pace has to come from technique. Comfort at 76 and tolerance at 77 both confirm this is an arm-friendly frame for long sessions. PRR score: 82/100.

130at PadelMarketReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05