padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Siux Electra Pro SE Black vs Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Best
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Siux

Siux Electra Pro SE Black

91
Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Starvie

Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

82
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro SE Black wins by 9 points

Siux Electra Pro SE Black scores 91/100 against 82/100 for the Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV. Its biggest edge is power (+11). The Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV answers back on sweet spot (+4). On price, the Siux Electra Pro SE Black is currently €129 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Overall
91/100Best
82/100
Control
78Best
76
Power
90Best
79
Sweet spot
66
70Best
Maneuverability
72
72
Comfort
67
71Best
Specs
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Shape
Round
Hybrid
Balance
Weight
360 g
Core
Face material
Level
Intermediate
Advanced
Playing style
Versatile
Power
Siux Electra Pro SE Black

The Electra Pro SE Black scores like a serious attacking frame: power 90 with control 78 puts it in flagship territory, and the profile suggests a player who wants to finish points from mid-court and trust drives under pressure. Comfort 67 and tolerance 66 tell the other half of the story: this is a firm, demanding hit that expects clean contact and a conditioned arm. Full specification for this special edition is unconfirmed, so we would not assert materials or balance we cannot verify. At value 62 it is priced ambitiously; demo one before you commit.

359at PadelProShopReview & prices
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

The Supreme Hybrid IV rounds out Cork's range with the same story as its siblings: a perfectly credible card, power 79, control 76, comfort 71, tolerance 70, wrapped in pricing that produces value 50. The 360 g hybrid plays a pleasant, versatile club game and would earn a straightforward recommendation at mainstream money. Specification is undocumented, so a demo is mandatory rather than advisable. The purchase logic remains what it is across this brand: you are paying a substantial premium for scarcity and the story. On playing merit per euro, the mainstream mid-market wins this comparison every time.

488at NINEPADELReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05