padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Siux Electra Pro SE Black vs Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Siux

Siux Electra Pro SE Black

Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Starvie

Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro SE Black gana por 9 puntos

Siux Electra Pro SE Black obtiene 91/100 frente a 82/100 de la Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+11). La Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV responde en punto dulce (+4). En precio, la Siux Electra Pro SE Black está actualmente €129 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
General
91/100Mejor
82/100
Control
78Mejor
76
Potencia
90Mejor
79
Punto dulce
66
70Mejor
Manejabilidad
72
72
Comodidad
67
71Mejor
Especificaciones
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Forma
Redonda
Híbrida
Balance
Peso
360 g
Núcleo
Material de la cara
Nivel
Intermedio
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Versátil
Potencia
Siux Electra Pro SE Black

The Electra Pro SE Black scores like a serious attacking frame: power 90 with control 78 puts it in flagship territory, and the profile suggests a player who wants to finish points from mid-court and trust drives under pressure. Comfort 67 and tolerance 66 tell the other half of the story: this is a firm, demanding hit that expects clean contact and a conditioned arm. Full specification for this special edition is unconfirmed, so we would not assert materials or balance we cannot verify. At value 62 it is priced ambitiously; demo one before you commit.

359en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

The Supreme Hybrid IV rounds out Cork's range with the same story as its siblings: a perfectly credible card, power 79, control 76, comfort 71, tolerance 70, wrapped in pricing that produces value 50. The 360 g hybrid plays a pleasant, versatile club game and would earn a straightforward recommendation at mainstream money. Specification is undocumented, so a demo is mandatory rather than advisable. The purchase logic remains what it is across this brand: you are paying a substantial premium for scarcity and the story. On playing merit per euro, the mainstream mid-market wins this comparison every time.

488en NINEPADELReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05