padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II vs Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Best
Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II
Starvie

Cork Extreme Deus II

83
Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Starvie

Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

82
PRR verdict

Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II wins by 1 point

Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II scores 83/100 against 82/100 for the Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV. Its biggest edge is power (+3). The Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV answers back on sweet spot (+1). On price, the Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV is currently €94 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Cork Extreme Deus II
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Overall
83/100Best
82/100
Control
76
76
Power
82Best
79
Sweet spot
69
70Best
Maneuverability
71
72Best
Comfort
70
71Best
Specs
Cork Extreme Deus II
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Balance
Even
Weight
360 g
360 g
Core
Face material
Level
Advanced
Advanced
Playing style
Power
Power
Cork Extreme Deus II

The Cork Extreme Deus II scores like a competent all-rounder: power 82 and control 76 in a teardrop that sits comfortably between attack and construction, with fair comfort 70 and tolerance 69. Played blind, it is a decent intermediate frame. The problem is the invoice: value 48 is among the lower scores we publish, because Cork's boutique pricing puts this card against frames that outgun it at half the money. Core and face documentation is also incomplete, so demo before considering. If the brand's exclusivity is the appeal, that is a legitimate preference; on playing merit alone, the market offers far better deals.

582at NINEPADELReview & prices
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

The Supreme Hybrid IV rounds out Cork's range with the same story as its siblings: a perfectly credible card, power 79, control 76, comfort 71, tolerance 70, wrapped in pricing that produces value 50. The 360 g hybrid plays a pleasant, versatile club game and would earn a straightforward recommendation at mainstream money. Specification is undocumented, so a demo is mandatory rather than advisable. The purchase logic remains what it is across this brand: you are paying a substantial premium for scarcity and the story. On playing merit per euro, the mainstream mid-market wins this comparison every time.

488at NINEPADELReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05