padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II vs Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II
Starvie

Cork Extreme Deus II

Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Starvie

Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Veredicto PRR

Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II gana por 1 punto

Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II obtiene 83/100 frente a 82/100 de la Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+3). La Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV responde en punto dulce (+1). En precio, la Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV está actualmente €94 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Cork Extreme Deus II
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
General
83/100Mejor
82/100
Control
76
76
Potencia
82Mejor
79
Punto dulce
69
70Mejor
Manejabilidad
71
72Mejor
Comodidad
70
71Mejor
Especificaciones
Cork Extreme Deus II
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Forma
Híbrida
Híbrida
Balance
Equilibrado
Peso
360 g
360 g
Núcleo
Material de la cara
Nivel
Avanzado
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Cork Extreme Deus II

The Cork Extreme Deus II scores like a competent all-rounder: power 82 and control 76 in a teardrop that sits comfortably between attack and construction, with fair comfort 70 and tolerance 69. Played blind, it is a decent intermediate frame. The problem is the invoice: value 48 is among the lower scores we publish, because Cork's boutique pricing puts this card against frames that outgun it at half the money. Core and face documentation is also incomplete, so demo before considering. If the brand's exclusivity is the appeal, that is a legitimate preference; on playing merit alone, the market offers far better deals.

583en NINEPADELReseña y precios
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

The Supreme Hybrid IV rounds out Cork's range with the same story as its siblings: a perfectly credible card, power 79, control 76, comfort 71, tolerance 70, wrapped in pricing that produces value 50. The 360 g hybrid plays a pleasant, versatile club game and would earn a straightforward recommendation at mainstream money. Specification is undocumented, so a demo is mandatory rather than advisable. The purchase logic remains what it is across this brand: you are paying a substantial premium for scarcity and the story. On playing merit per euro, the mainstream mid-market wins this comparison every time.

488en NINEPADELReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05