padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia vs Starvie Cork Classic II

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Starvie Cork Classic II
Starvie

Cork Classic II

Veredicto PRR

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia gana por 12 puntos

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia obtiene 93/100 frente a 81/100 de la Starvie Cork Classic II. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+12). La Starvie Cork Classic II responde en punto dulce (+3). En precio, la Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia está actualmente €128 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Cork Classic II
General
93/100Mejor
81/100
Control
84Mejor
76
Potencia
88Mejor
76
Punto dulce
68
71Mejor
Manejabilidad
76Mejor
72
Comodidad
70
72Mejor
Especificaciones
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Cork Classic II
Forma
Lágrima
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
360–375 g
335 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Foam
Material de la cara
Carbon 18K
Carbon 3K
Nivel
Profesional
Principiante
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Control
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Tapia's AT10 Genius 18K Alum is the rare frame that hits like an attacker's racket but doesn't fall apart when you defend. The 18K carbon face over a black EVA core gives a dense, springy strike: drives carry pace (power 88), yet the teardrop shape and even balance keep the head obedient on bandejas and blocks (control 84). It sits at the top of our table because it asks fewer sacrifices than a pure diamond. The compromises are familiar: comfort 70 means the stiffness reaches your elbow eventually, and tolerance 68 still wants near-middle contact.

238en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Cork Classic II

The Cork Classic II is a mid-range recreational racket built around a cork-infused core that promises a softer, dampened feel, but delivers only modest performance across all dimensions without excelling in any single area. The round-to-mid shape offers reasonable maneuverability and some control for beginner to intermediate players, but the power ceiling is low and off-center strikes are punishing enough to frustrate developing technique. Budget-conscious beginners who prioritize arm comfort over progression-enabling performance will find it serviceable, but most players will quickly outgrow it.

366en NINEPADELReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05