padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia vs Starvie Cork Classic II

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Melhor
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Starvie Cork Classic II
Starvie

Cork Classic II

Veredito PRR

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia ganha por 12 pontos

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia obtém 93/100 contra 81/100 da Starvie Cork Classic II. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+12). A Starvie Cork Classic II responde em ponto doce (+3). Em preço, a Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia está atualmente €128 mais barata.

Detalhe da pontuação
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Cork Classic II
Geral
93/100Melhor
81/100
Controlo
84Melhor
76
Potência
88Melhor
76
Ponto doce
68
71Melhor
Manobrabilidade
76Melhor
72
Conforto
70
72Melhor
Especificações
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Cork Classic II
Forma
Lágrima
Redonda
Balanço
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
360–375 g
335 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Foam
Material da face
Carbon 18K
Carbon 3K
Nível
Profissional
Principiante
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Controlo
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Tapia's AT10 Genius 18K Alum is the rare frame that hits like an attacker's racket but doesn't fall apart when you defend. The 18K carbon face over a black EVA core gives a dense, springy strike: drives carry pace (power 88), yet the teardrop shape and even balance keep the head obedient on bandejas and blocks (control 84). It sits at the top of our table because it asks fewer sacrifices than a pure diamond. The compromises are familiar: comfort 70 means the stiffness reaches your elbow eventually, and tolerance 68 still wants near-middle contact.

238em PadelProShopAnálise e preços
Cork Classic II

The Cork Classic II is a mid-range recreational racket built around a cork-infused core that promises a softer, dampened feel, but delivers only modest performance across all dimensions without excelling in any single area. The round-to-mid shape offers reasonable maneuverability and some control for beginner to intermediate players, but the power ceiling is low and off-center strikes are punishing enough to frustrate developing technique. Budget-conscious beginners who prioritize arm comfort over progression-enabling performance will find it serviceable, but most players will quickly outgrow it.

366em NINEPADELAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05