Compare
Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 vs Black Mamba Radical 12K 3.0


The Hyper Pro+ 2.0 is the better racket, 98 to 83: more sweet spot and handling. The Black costs €36 less.
Our scores, updated 8 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper takes 5 of the six, the Black takes value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €36 question
€36
more for the Hyper. This is what it buys you.
- +28Sweet spot92 against 64
- +28Handling96 against 68
- +21Control91 against 70
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €36: the Black is 83 in Our score.
What is different
Weight, balance and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.

The same face on both: carbon 12k.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The Black is about 365 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Hyper puts a little more weight behind a smash.
Edge: the Black, for quick hands
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€36 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Black 26%. The Black wins the value round, 66 to 62.
Edge: the Black, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.

Hyper Pro+ 2.0
Our score 98 · €287Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Black has 66 for value against its 62.

Black Mamba Radical 12K 3.0
Our score 83 · €251Skip it if you want quicker hands: the Hyper has 96 for handling against its 68.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0
The higher score, 98 to 83.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Hyper +15
No other site has scored the Hyper or the Black yet. When one does, it shows here.
Your shape
What players said
2 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.

Hyper Pro+ 2.0
0 of 2 liked it
Liked it 0No strong view 2Did not 0
Only 2 players so far: too few to rank what they said.

Black Mamba Radical 12K 3.0
No player has told us about the Black yet.

Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0
The better racket, 98 to 83: more sweet spot and handling.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Carbon 12K face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.

Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Hyper Pro+ 2.0 or the Black Mamba Radical 12K 3.0?
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0 is the better racket, 98 to 83: more sweet spot and handling. The Black costs €36 less.
What is the difference between the Hyper Pro+ 2.0 and the Black Mamba Radical 12K 3.0?
The same face on both: carbon 12k. The Black is about 365 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Hyper puts a little more weight behind a smash. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for sweet spot?
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0: sweet spot 92 against 64.
What is the price difference?
€36 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Black 26%. The Black wins the value round, 66 to 62.

