Compare
Oxdog Hyper Tour 2.0 vs Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0
The Hyper Tour 2.0 and the Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0 score the same, 84. It is also €36 cheaper.
Our scores, updated 8 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper takes 5 of the six, the Vibor-A takes power.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
What is different
Four things change between them. Pick one to look closer.
12K packs 12,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 3,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Vibor-A's 3K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late.
Edge: the Hyper, for precision
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The Vibor-A is about 352 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Hyper puts a little more weight behind a smash.
Edge: the Vibor-A, for quick hands
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€36 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Vibor-A 31%. The better racket is the cheaper one here.
Edge: the Hyper, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Hyper Tour 2.0
Our score 84 · €225Skip it if you want more power: the Vibor-A has 86 for power against its 80.
Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0
Our score 84 · €261Skip it if you want quicker hands: the Hyper has 80 for handling against its 68.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper Tour 2.0
The higher score, 84 to 84.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Level
No other site has scored the Hyper or the Vibor-A yet. When one does, it shows here.
Your shape
What players said
2 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
Hyper Tour 2.0
0 of 2 liked it
Liked it 0No strong view 0Did not 2
What they said, by how many said it
Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0
No player has told us about the Vibor-A yet.
Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper Tour 2.0
The better racket, 84 to 84: more sweet spot and handling.
- 5 of 6 scores
- €36 cheaper
- Carbon 12K face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Hyper Tour 2.0 or the Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0?
The Hyper Tour 2.0 and the Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0 score the same, 84. It is also €36 cheaper.
What is the difference between the Hyper Tour 2.0 and the Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0?
12K packs 12,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 3,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Vibor-A's 3K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late. The Vibor-A is about 352 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Hyper puts a little more weight behind a smash. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for sweet spot?
The Hyper Tour 2.0: sweet spot 76 against 64.
What is the price difference?
€36 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Vibor-A 31%. The better racket is the cheaper one here.
Hyper Tour 2.0Buy €225