Compare
Adidas Cross IT Carbon vs Cross It Team 3.4


The Cross IT Carbon is the better racket, 83 to 76: more power. The Team 3.4 costs €89 less for the same diamond shape and core.
Our scores, updated 9 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Carbon takes 1 of the six, the Team 3.4 takes sweet spot and comfort and handling and value, and control is level.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €89 question
€89
more for the Carbon. This is what it buys you.
- +10Power82 against 72
- 6KA 6K carbon faceagainst fibreglass: a stiffer face, a crisper answer on volleys
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €89: the Team 3.4 is 76 in Our score.
What is different
Four things change between them. Pick one to look closer.

Carbon against fibreglass: the Carbon's carbon is stiffer and more precise, the Team 3.4's fibreglass is softer, gives the ball more pop at low speed and forgives more.
Edge: the Carbon, for precision
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The Team 3.4 is about 15 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Carbon puts a little more weight behind a smash.
Edge: the Team 3.4, for quick hands
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€89 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Carbon 36%, Team 3.4 50%. The Team 3.4 wins the value round, 78 to 74.
Edge: the Team 3.4, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.

Cross IT Carbon
Our score 83 · €179Skip it if you want a bigger sweet spot: the Team 3.4 has 74 for sweet spot against its 69.

Cross It Team 3.4
Our score 76 · €90Skip it if you want more power: the Carbon has 82 for power against its 72.
Our recommendation for most players
The Cross IT Carbon
The higher score, 83 to 76.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Carbon +7
Padelful
Has scored only the Team 3.4
PadelReference
Has scored only the Team 3.4
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
2 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.

Cross IT Carbon
No player has told us about the Carbon yet.

Cross It Team 3.4
0 of 2 liked it
Liked it 0No strong view 2Did not 0
Only 2 players so far: too few to rank what they said.

Our recommendation
Adidas Cross IT Carbon
The better racket, 83 to 76: more power.
- Our score 83 against 76
- Carbon 6K face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.

Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Cross IT Carbon or the Cross It Team 3.4?
The Cross IT Carbon is the better racket, 83 to 76: more power. The Team 3.4 costs €89 less for the same diamond shape and core.
What is the difference between the Cross IT Carbon and the Cross It Team 3.4?
Carbon against fibreglass: the Carbon's carbon is stiffer and more precise, the Team 3.4's fibreglass is softer, gives the ball more pop at low speed and forgives more. The Team 3.4 is about 15 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Carbon puts a little more weight behind a smash. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for power?
The Cross IT Carbon: power 82 against 72.
What is the price difference?
€89 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Carbon 36%, Team 3.4 50%. The Team 3.4 wins the value round, 78 to 74.

