Compare
Babolat Technical Viper Soft 3.0 vs Teide
The Technical Viper Soft 3.0 is the better racket, 87 to 77: more control and comfort. The Teide is not at PadelProShop right now.
Our scores, updated 9 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Technical takes 5 of the six, and value is level.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
What is different
Four things change between them. Pick one to look closer.
18K packs 18,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 3,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Technical's 3K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late.
Edge: the Teide, for precision
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
About the same weight: 365 g and 360 to 370 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
Only the Technical is at PadelProShop right now, at €152.
No edge either way
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Technical Viper Soft 3.0
Our score 87 · €152Skip it if handling matters most to you: it is its lowest score, 72.
Teide
Our score 77 · not in stockSkip it if you want more control: the Technical has 82 for control against its 70.
Our recommendation for most players
The Technical Viper Soft 3.0
The higher score, 87 to 77.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Technical +10
PadelReference
Has scored only the Technical
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
2 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
Technical Viper Soft 3.0
No player has told us about the Technical yet.
Teide
0 of 2 liked it
Liked it 0No strong view 2Did not 0
Only 2 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Our recommendation
Babolat Technical Viper Soft 3.0
The better racket, 87 to 77: more control and comfort.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Carbon 3K face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Technical Viper Soft 3.0 or the Teide?
The Technical Viper Soft 3.0 is the better racket, 87 to 77: more control and comfort. The Teide is not at PadelProShop right now.
What is the difference between the Technical Viper Soft 3.0 and the Teide?
18K packs 18,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 3,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Technical's 3K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late. About the same weight: 365 g and 360 to 370 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for control?
The Technical Viper Soft 3.0: control 82 against 70.
What is the price difference?
Only the Technical is at PadelProShop right now, at €152.
