Compare
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Coello Pro
The Technical Viper 3.0 is the better racket, 91 to 88: more power and control. It is also €38 cheaper.
Our scores, updated 9 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Technical takes 2 of the six, the Coello takes sweet spot and comfort and handling and value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
Better, and cheaper
€38
less for the better racket. No trade-off on price here.
- +3Power94 against 91
- +2Control74 against 72
- 3KA 3K carbon faceagainst carbon and fibreglass: a stiffer face, a crisper answer on volleys
The Technical scores higher and costs less. The Coello only makes sense if one of its own strengths is the one you play for.
What is different
Face, balance and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.
Carbon 3K on the Technical, carbon and fibreglass on the Coello.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The same weight, 370 g.
No edge either way
Where each one balances, measured from the end of the handle. The lower the point, the more of the weight sits in your hand: the Technical at 270 mm, the Coello at 272 mm.
Edge: the Technical, for your arm
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€38 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Technical 34%, Coello 19%. The better racket is the cheaper one here.
Edge: the Technical, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Technical Viper 3.0
Our score 91 · €245Skip it if you want more comfort: the Coello has 64 for comfort against its 62.
Coello Pro
Our score 88 · €283Skip it if you want more power: the Technical has 94 for power against its 91.
Our recommendation for most players
The Technical Viper 3.0
The higher score, 91 to 88.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Technical +3
Padelful
Level
Padel.fyi
Has scored only the Coello
PadelReference
Coello +6
0 of the 2 other sites that scored both put the same one ahead. We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
9 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
Technical Viper 3.0
2 of 7 liked it
Liked it 2No strong view 4Did not 1
Only 7 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Coello Pro
1 of 2 liked it
Liked it 1No strong view 1Did not 0
Only 2 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Our recommendation
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
The better racket, 91 to 88: more power and control.
- Our score 91 against 88
- €38 cheaper
- Carbon 3K face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Technical Viper 3.0 or the Coello Pro?
The Technical Viper 3.0 is the better racket, 91 to 88: more power and control. It is also €38 cheaper.
What is the difference between the Technical Viper 3.0 and the Coello Pro?
Carbon 3K on the Technical, carbon and fibreglass on the Coello. The same weight, 370 g. Where each one balances, measured from the end of the handle. The lower the point, the more of the weight sits in your hand: the Technical at 270 mm, the Coello at 272 mm.
Which is better for power?
The Technical Viper 3.0: power 94 against 91.
What is the price difference?
€38 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Technical 34%, Coello 19%. The better racket is the cheaper one here.
