Compare
Drop Shot Explorer Pro Attack 2.0 vs Hyper Pro+ 2.0


The Hyper Pro+ 2.0 is the better racket, 98 to 78: more handling and sweet spot. The Explorer costs €116 less.
Our scores, updated 9 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper takes 5 of the six, and value is level.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €116 question
€116
more for the Hyper. This is what it buys you.
- +26Handling96 against 70
- +24Sweet spot92 against 68
- +22Power98 against 76
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €116: the Explorer is 78 in Our score.
What is different
Four things change between them. Pick one to look closer.

24K packs 24,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 12,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Hyper's 12K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late.
Edge: the Explorer, for precision
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The Explorer is about 365 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Hyper puts a little more weight behind a smash.
Edge: the Explorer, for quick hands
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€116 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Explorer 50%.
Edge: the Explorer, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.

Explorer Pro Attack 2.0
Our score 78 · €171Skip it if you want quicker hands: the Hyper has 96 for handling against its 70.

Hyper Pro+ 2.0
Our score 98 · €287Skip it if value matters most to you: it is its lowest score, 62.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0
The higher score, 98 to 78.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Hyper +20
No other site has scored the Explorer or the Hyper yet. When one does, it shows here.
Your shape
What players said
2 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.

Explorer Pro Attack 2.0
No player has told us about the Explorer yet.

Hyper Pro+ 2.0
0 of 2 liked it
Liked it 0No strong view 2Did not 0
Only 2 players so far: too few to rank what they said.

Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0
The better racket, 98 to 78: more handling and sweet spot.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Carbon 12K face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.

Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Explorer Pro Attack 2.0 or the Hyper Pro+ 2.0?
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0 is the better racket, 98 to 78: more handling and sweet spot. The Explorer costs €116 less.
What is the difference between the Explorer Pro Attack 2.0 and the Hyper Pro+ 2.0?
24K packs 24,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 12,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Hyper's 12K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late. The Explorer is about 365 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Hyper puts a little more weight behind a smash. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for handling?
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0: handling 96 against 70.
What is the price difference?
€116 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Explorer 50%.


