Compare
Drop Shot Flame Soft vs Hyper Tour X 2.0
The Hyper Tour X 2.0 is the better racket, 96 to 77: more control and sweet spot. The Flame costs €82 less.
Our scores, updated 12 September 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper takes 5 of the six, the Flame takes value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €82 question
€82
more for the Hyper. This is what it buys you.
- +26Control96 against 70
- +23Sweet spot95 against 72
- +23Handling95 against 72
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €82: the Flame is 77 in Our score.
What is different
Face, weight and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.
The same face on both: carbon 12k.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
About the same weight: 350 to 370 g and 365 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€82 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Flame 49%. The Flame wins the value round, 72 to 66.
Edge: the Flame, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Flame Soft
Our score 77 · €143Skip it if you want more control: the Hyper has 96 for control against its 70.
Hyper Tour X 2.0
Our score 96 · €225Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Flame has 72 for value against its 66.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper Tour X 2.0
The higher score, 96 to 77.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Hyper +19
PadelReference
Has scored only the Hyper
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
Players who own a racket tell us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
No player has told us about the Flame or the Hyper yet. If you own one, two minutes drawing your shape puts your word here, beside the other players who own it.
Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper Tour X 2.0
The better racket, 96 to 77: more control and sweet spot.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Carbon face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Flame Soft or the Hyper Tour X 2.0?
The Hyper Tour X 2.0 is the better racket, 96 to 77: more control and sweet spot. The Flame costs €82 less.
What is the difference between the Flame Soft and the Hyper Tour X 2.0?
The same face on both: carbon 12k. About the same weight: 350 to 370 g and 365 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for control?
The Hyper Tour X 2.0: control 96 against 70.
What is the price difference?
€82 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Flame 49%. The Flame wins the value round, 72 to 66.
Hyper Tour X 2.0Buy €225