Compare
Dunlop Fx Pro vs Classics Ultimate Pro+


The Classics Ultimate Pro+ is the better racket, 87 to 79: more handling and control. The Fx is not at PadelProShop right now.
Our scores, updated 9 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Classics takes 5 of the six, the Fx takes value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
What is different
Face and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.


Carbon 12K on the Fx, not listed on the Classics.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The same weight, 370 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
Only the Classics is at PadelProShop right now, at €296.
No edge either way
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.

Fx Pro
Our score 79 · not in stockSkip it if you want quicker hands: the Classics has 80 for handling against its 68.

Classics Ultimate Pro+
Our score 87 · €296Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Fx has 72 for value against its 62.
Our recommendation for most players
The Classics Ultimate Pro+
The higher score, 87 to 79.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Classics +8
PadelReference
Has scored only the Classics
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
Players who own a racket tell us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
No player has told us about the Fx or the Classics yet. If you own one, two minutes drawing your shape puts your word here, beside the other players who own it.

Our recommendation
Oxdog Classics Ultimate Pro+
The better racket, 87 to 79: more handling and control.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Not listed face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.

Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Fx Pro or the Classics Ultimate Pro+?
The Classics Ultimate Pro+ is the better racket, 87 to 79: more handling and control. The Fx is not at PadelProShop right now.
What is the difference between the Fx Pro and the Classics Ultimate Pro+?
Carbon 12K on the Fx, not listed on the Classics. The same weight, 370 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for handling?
The Classics Ultimate Pro+: handling 80 against 68.
What is the price difference?
Only the Classics is at PadelProShop right now, at €296.

