Compare
Lok Be Flow vs Mamba Evo Pro
The Mamba Evo Pro is the better racket, 82 to 73: more power. The Be costs €104 less for the same round shape and core.
Our scores, updated 7 July 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Mamba takes 1 of the six, the Be takes sweet spot and comfort and handling and value, and control is level.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €104 question
€104
more for the Mamba. This is what it buys you.
- +14Power84 against 70
- 368 gLighter0 g against 360 to 375 g: quicker to the ball at the net
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €104: the Be is 73 in Our score.
What is different
Face, weight and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.
Fibreglass on the Be, not listed on the Mamba.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The Mamba is about 368 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Be puts a little more weight behind a smash.
Edge: the Mamba, for quick hands
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€104 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Be 31%, Mamba 32%. The Be wins the value round, 88 to 68.
Edge: the Be, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Be Flow
Our score 73 · €76Skip it if you want more power: the Mamba has 84 for power against its 70.
Mamba Evo Pro
Our score 82 · €180Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Be has 88 for value against its 68.
Our recommendation for most players
The Mamba Evo Pro
The higher score, 82 to 73.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Mamba +9
Padelful
Has scored only the Be
PadelReference
Has scored only the Be
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
Players who own a racket tell us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
No player has told us about the Be or the Mamba yet. If you own one, two minutes drawing your shape puts your word here, beside the other players who own it.
Our recommendation
Vibor A Mamba Evo Pro
The better racket, 82 to 73: more power.
- Our score 82 against 73
- About 368 g lighter
- Not listed face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Be Flow or the Mamba Evo Pro?
The Mamba Evo Pro is the better racket, 82 to 73: more power. The Be costs €104 less for the same round shape and core.
What is the difference between the Be Flow and the Mamba Evo Pro?
Fibreglass on the Be, not listed on the Mamba. The Mamba is about 368 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Be puts a little more weight behind a smash. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for power?
The Mamba Evo Pro: power 84 against 70.
What is the price difference?
€104 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Be 31%, Mamba 32%. The Be wins the value round, 88 to 68.
