Compare
Osaka Vision Pro Power vs Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics
The Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics is the better racket, 87 to 78: more handling and sweet spot. The Vision is not at PadelProShop right now.
Our scores, updated 9 July 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper 2.0 takes 5 of the six, the Vision takes value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
What is different
Four things change between them. Pick one to look closer.
The same face on both: carbon 3k.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
About the same weight: 355 to 370 g and 365 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
Only the Hyper 2.0 is at PadelProShop right now, at €270.
No edge either way
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Vision Pro Power
Our score 78 · not in stockSkip it if you want quicker hands: the Hyper 2.0 has 82 for handling against its 69.
Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics
Our score 87 · €270Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Vision has 70 for value against its 60.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics
The higher score, 87 to 78.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Hyper 2.0 +9
PadelReference
Has scored only the Hyper 2.0
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
3 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
Vision Pro Power
No player has told us about the Vision yet.
Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics
2 of 3 liked it
Liked it 2No strong view 1Did not 0
Only 3 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics
The better racket, 87 to 78: more handling and sweet spot.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Carbon face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Vision Pro Power or the Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics?
The Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics is the better racket, 87 to 78: more handling and sweet spot. The Vision is not at PadelProShop right now.
What is the difference between the Vision Pro Power and the Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics?
The same face on both: carbon 3k. About the same weight: 355 to 370 g and 365 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for handling?
The Hyper 2.0 Pro Classics: handling 82 against 69.
What is the price difference?
Only the Hyper 2.0 is at PadelProShop right now, at €270.
Hyper 2.0 Pro ClassicsBuy €270