Compare
Oxdog Classics Ultimate Pro+ vs Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
The Classics Ultimate Pro+ and the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics score the same, 87. The Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics costs €26 less.
Our scores, updated 9 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Classics Ultimate Pro+ takes 2 of the six, the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics takes control and sweet spot and handling, and comfort is level.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
What is different
Weight and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.
The same face on both: not listed.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics is about 10 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Classics Ultimate Pro+ puts a little more weight behind a smash.
Edge: the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics, for quick hands
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€26 apart at PadelProShop today.
Edge: the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Classics Ultimate Pro+
Our score 87 · €296Skip it if you want a bigger sweet spot: the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics has 78 for sweet spot against its 71.
Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
Our score 87 · €270Skip it if you want more power: the Classics Ultimate Pro+ has 87 for power against its 83.
Our recommendation for most players
The Classics Ultimate Pro+
The higher score, 87 to 87.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Level
PadelReference
Level
1 of the 1 other site that scored both puts the same one ahead. We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
3 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
Classics Ultimate Pro+
No player has told us about the Classics Ultimate Pro+ yet.
Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
2 of 3 liked it
Liked it 2No strong view 1Did not 0
Only 3 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Our recommendation
Oxdog Classics Ultimate Pro+
The better racket, 87 to 87: more power and value.
- Our score 87 against 87
- Not listed face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Or the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics€270, €26 less · Our score 87
Buy the Hyper Pro 2.0 ClassicsRead our reviewPrice alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Classics Ultimate Pro+ or the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics?
The Classics Ultimate Pro+ and the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics score the same, 87. The Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics costs €26 less.
What is the difference between the Classics Ultimate Pro+ and the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics?
The same face on both: not listed. The Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics is about 10 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Classics Ultimate Pro+ puts a little more weight behind a smash. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for power?
The Classics Ultimate Pro+: power 87 against 83.
What is the price difference?
€26 apart at PadelProShop today.
Classics Ultimate Pro+Buy €296