Compare
Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 vs Trilogy Pro 5
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0 is the better racket, 98 to 82: more sweet spot and handling. The Trilogy costs €171 less.
Our scores, updated 9 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper takes 5 of the six, the Trilogy takes value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €171 question
€171
more for the Hyper. This is what it buys you.
- +23Sweet spot92 against 69
- +23Handling96 against 73
- +19Power98 against 79
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €171: the Trilogy is 82 in Our score.
What is different
Four things change between them. Pick one to look closer.
24K packs 24,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 12,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Hyper's 12K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late.
Edge: the Trilogy, for precision
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
About the same weight: 365 g and 360 to 375 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€171 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Trilogy 64%. The Trilogy wins the value round, 80 to 62.
Edge: the Trilogy, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Hyper Pro+ 2.0
Our score 98 · €287Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Trilogy has 80 for value against its 62.
Trilogy Pro 5
Our score 82 · €116Skip it if you want quicker hands: the Hyper has 96 for handling against its 73.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0
The higher score, 98 to 82.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Hyper +16
Padelful
Has scored only the Trilogy
PadelReference
Has scored only the Trilogy
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
5 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
Hyper Pro+ 2.0
0 of 2 liked it
Liked it 0No strong view 2Did not 0
Only 2 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Trilogy Pro 5
2 of 3 liked it
Liked it 2No strong view 1Did not 0
Only 3 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0
The better racket, 98 to 82: more sweet spot and handling.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Carbon 12K face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Hyper Pro+ 2.0 or the Trilogy Pro 5?
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0 is the better racket, 98 to 82: more sweet spot and handling. The Trilogy costs €171 less.
What is the difference between the Hyper Pro+ 2.0 and the Trilogy Pro 5?
24K packs 24,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 12,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Hyper's 12K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late. About the same weight: 365 g and 360 to 375 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for sweet spot?
The Hyper Pro+ 2.0: sweet spot 92 against 69.
What is the price difference?
€171 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Trilogy 64%. The Trilogy wins the value round, 80 to 62.
Hyper Pro+ 2.0Buy €287