Compare
Drop Shot Axion Attack Soft vs Coello Motion
The Coello Motion is the better racket, 93 to 81: more sweet spot and handling. The Axion costs €17 less.
Our scores, updated 12 September 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Coello takes 6 of the six.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €17 question
€17
more for the Coello. This is what it buys you.
- +20Sweet spot88 against 68
- +17Handling84 against 67
- +15Power97 against 82
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €17: the Axion is 81 in Our score.
What is different
Four things change between them. Pick one to look closer.
Carbon 12K on the Axion, carbon and fibreglass on the Coello.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
About the same weight: 350 to 370 g and 360 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€17 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Axion 42%, Coello 49%.
Edge: the Axion, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Axion Attack Soft
Our score 81 · €162Skip it if you want a bigger sweet spot: the Coello has 88 for sweet spot against its 68.
Coello Motion
Our score 93 · €179Skip it if value matters most to you: it is its lowest score, 74.
Our recommendation for most players
The Coello Motion
The higher score, 93 to 81.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
1 of the 2 other sites that scored both put the same one ahead. We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
5 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
Axion Attack Soft
No player has told us about the Axion yet.
Coello Motion
3 of 5 liked it
Liked it 3No strong view 1Did not 1
What they said, by how many said it
Our recommendation
HEAD Coello Motion
The better racket, 93 to 81: more sweet spot and handling.
- 6 of 6 scores
- Carbon and fibreglass face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Axion Attack Soft or the Coello Motion?
The Coello Motion is the better racket, 93 to 81: more sweet spot and handling. The Axion costs €17 less.
What is the difference between the Axion Attack Soft and the Coello Motion?
Carbon 12K on the Axion, carbon and fibreglass on the Coello. About the same weight: 350 to 370 g and 360 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for sweet spot?
The Coello Motion: sweet spot 88 against 68.
What is the price difference?
€17 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Axion 42%, Coello 49%.
