Compare
Drop Shot Axion Attack Soft vs Hyper Tour X 2.0
The Hyper Tour X 2.0 is the better racket, 96 to 81: more handling and sweet spot. The Axion costs €63 less.
Our scores, updated 12 September 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper takes 5 of the six, the Axion takes value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €63 question
€63
more for the Hyper. This is what it buys you.
- +28Handling95 against 67
- +27Sweet spot95 against 68
- +25Control96 against 71
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €63: the Axion is 81 in Our score.
What is different
Face, weight and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.
The same face on both: carbon 12k.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
About the same weight: 350 to 370 g and 365 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€63 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Axion 42%. The Axion wins the value round, 68 to 66.
Edge: the Axion, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Axion Attack Soft
Our score 81 · €162Skip it if you want quicker hands: the Hyper has 95 for handling against its 67.
Hyper Tour X 2.0
Our score 96 · €225Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Axion has 68 for value against its 66.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper Tour X 2.0
The higher score, 96 to 81.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
1 of the 1 other site that scored both puts the same one ahead. We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
Players who own a racket tell us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
No player has told us about the Axion or the Hyper yet. If you own one, two minutes drawing your shape puts your word here, beside the other players who own it.
Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper Tour X 2.0
The better racket, 96 to 81: more handling and sweet spot.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Carbon face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Axion Attack Soft or the Hyper Tour X 2.0?
The Hyper Tour X 2.0 is the better racket, 96 to 81: more handling and sweet spot. The Axion costs €63 less.
What is the difference between the Axion Attack Soft and the Hyper Tour X 2.0?
The same face on both: carbon 12k. About the same weight: 350 to 370 g and 365 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for handling?
The Hyper Tour X 2.0: handling 95 against 67.
What is the price difference?
€63 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Axion 42%. The Axion wins the value round, 68 to 66.
Hyper Tour X 2.0Buy €225