Compare
Drop Shot Blitz Attack vs Hyper Tour X 2.0
The Hyper Tour X 2.0 is the better racket, 96 to 80: more sweet spot and handling. The Blitz costs €32 less.
Our scores, updated 12 September 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper takes 5 of the six, the Blitz takes value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €32 question
€32
more for the Hyper. This is what it buys you.
- +30Sweet spot95 against 65
- +27Handling95 against 68
- +26Control96 against 70
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €32: the Blitz is 80 in Our score.
What is different
Face, weight and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.
The same face on both: carbon 24k.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
About the same weight: 360 to 370 g and 365 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€32 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Blitz 46%. The Blitz wins the value round, 72 to 66.
Edge: the Blitz, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Blitz Attack
Our score 80 · €193Skip it if you want a bigger sweet spot: the Hyper has 95 for sweet spot against its 65.
Hyper Tour X 2.0
Our score 96 · €225Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Blitz has 72 for value against its 66.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper Tour X 2.0
The higher score, 96 to 80.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
Hyper +16
PadelReference
Has scored only the Hyper
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
Players who own a racket tell us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
No player has told us about the Blitz or the Hyper yet. If you own one, two minutes drawing your shape puts your word here, beside the other players who own it.
Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper Tour X 2.0
The better racket, 96 to 80: more sweet spot and handling.
- 5 of 6 scores
- Carbon face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Blitz Attack or the Hyper Tour X 2.0?
The Hyper Tour X 2.0 is the better racket, 96 to 80: more sweet spot and handling. The Blitz costs €32 less.
What is the difference between the Blitz Attack and the Hyper Tour X 2.0?
The same face on both: carbon 24k. About the same weight: 360 to 370 g and 365 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for sweet spot?
The Hyper Tour X 2.0: sweet spot 95 against 65.
What is the price difference?
€32 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Blitz 46%. The Blitz wins the value round, 72 to 66.
Hyper Tour X 2.0Buy €225