Compare
Drop Shot Explorer Pro Attack 2.0 vs Explorer Pro Attack Soft
The Explorer Pro Attack 2.0 is the better racket, 78 to 77: more power. The Soft costs €32 less.
Our scores, updated 11 June 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The 2.0 takes 1 of the six, the Soft takes control and sweet spot and comfort and handling and value.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €32 question
€32
more for the 2.0. This is what it buys you.
- +4Power76 against 72
- 368 gLighter0 g against 360 to 375 g: quicker to the ball at the net
- 24KA 24K carbon faceagainst 12K: a stiffer face, a crisper answer on volleys
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €32: the Soft is 77 in Our score.
What is different
Face, weight and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.
24K packs 24,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 12,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Soft's 12K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late.
Edge: the 2.0, for precision
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
The 2.0 is about 368 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Soft puts a little more weight behind a smash.
Edge: the 2.0, for quick hands
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€32 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: 2.0 50%, Soft 50%. The Soft wins the value round, 68 to 62.
Edge: the Soft, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Explorer Pro Attack 2.0
Our score 78 · €171Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Soft has 68 for value against its 62.
Explorer Pro Attack Soft
Our score 77 · €139Skip it if you want more power: the 2.0 has 76 for power against its 72.
Our recommendation for most players
The Explorer Pro Attack 2.0
The higher score, 78 to 77.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
Our score
2.0 +1
Padelful
Has scored only the Soft
PadelReference
Has scored only the Soft
We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
Players who own a racket tell us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
No player has told us about the 2.0 or the Soft yet. If you own one, two minutes drawing your shape puts your word here, beside the other players who own it.
Our recommendation
Drop Shot Explorer Pro Attack 2.0
The better racket, 78 to 77: more power.
- Our score 78 against 77
- About 368 g lighter
- Carbon 24K face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Explorer Pro Attack 2.0 or the Explorer Pro Attack Soft?
The Explorer Pro Attack 2.0 is the better racket, 78 to 77: more power. The Soft costs €32 less.
What is the difference between the Explorer Pro Attack 2.0 and the Explorer Pro Attack Soft?
24K packs 24,000 carbon filaments into each thread against 12,000: a stiffer face that answers sooner on volleys. The Soft's 12K is a little softer and gives you more time when you are late. The 2.0 is about 368 g lighter: quicker to the ball at the net. The Soft puts a little more weight behind a smash. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for power?
The Explorer Pro Attack 2.0: power 76 against 72.
What is the price difference?
€32 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: 2.0 50%, Soft 50%. The Soft wins the value round, 68 to 62.
