Compare
Head Speed One vs Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
The Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics is the better racket, 87 to 81: more sweet spot and handling. The Speed costs €124 less.
Our scores, updated 9 November 2026 · How we score
Score by score
How we score →The green bar wins the round. The Hyper takes 4 of the six, the Speed takes value, and power is level.
Feel is read from the core and the face until hardness is measured.
The €124 question
€124
more for the Hyper. This is what it buys you.
- +11Sweet spot78 against 67
- +10Handling82 against 72
- +8Control79 against 71
Worth it if these numbers are the ones you play for. If not, keep the €124: the Speed is 81 in Our score.
What is different
Weight, balance and price change between them; the rest is the same. Pick one to look closer.
The same face on both: not listed.
No edge either way
* The feel starts from the core's rated hardness (estimated from the core material where there is no rating), then the face: carbon 12K and up is firmer, fibreglass softer.
About the same weight: 365 g and 360 g.
No edge either way
The balance point is not listed for both.
No edge either way
* Drawn to scale: a 455 mm racket in its shape's outline (traced from a real racket of that shape), with the balance point the shops list marked on it. Real rackets vary by a few millimetres.
€124 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Speed 51%. The Speed wins the value round, 76 to 60.
Edge: the Speed, for your wallet
Specs from the makers and the shops that sell them. Weights are the maker's figures, not measured by us.
Which one sounds like you?
Tap every line that sounds like you.
Speed One
Our score 81 · €146Skip it if you want a bigger sweet spot: the Hyper has 78 for sweet spot against its 67.
Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
Our score 87 · €270Skip it if you want more racket for the money: the Speed has 76 for value against its 60.
Our recommendation for most players
The Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
The higher score, 87 to 81.
Not sure of your level? Padel DNA matches rackets to how you play.
What other reviewers scored them
Out of 100, each linked to its page.
1 of the 1 other site that scored both puts the same one ahead. We do not change ours to match.
Your shape
What players said
5 players who own or have owned one of them told us how it plays. It is their word: it is not a review and does not count towards Our score.
Speed One
1 of 2 liked it
Liked it 1No strong view 1Did not 0
Only 2 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
2 of 3 liked it
Liked it 2No strong view 1Did not 0
Only 3 players so far: too few to rank what they said.
Our recommendation
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
The better racket, 87 to 81: more sweet spot and handling.
- 4 of 6 scores
- Not listed face
When you buy through PadelProShop we earn a commission. It never changes a score.
Price alert
Share the cards
The comparison as two cards, for a post, a story or a group chat.
Download
Or share the page
Before you buy
Questions
Straight answers.
Which is better, the Speed One or the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics?
The Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics is the better racket, 87 to 81: more sweet spot and handling. The Speed costs €124 less.
What is the difference between the Speed One and the Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics?
The same face on both: not listed. About the same weight: 365 g and 360 g. The balance point is not listed for both.
Which is better for sweet spot?
The Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics: sweet spot 78 against 67.
What is the price difference?
€124 apart at PadelProShop today. Under the launch price: Speed 51%. The Speed wins the value round, 76 to 60.
Hyper Pro 2.0 ClassicsBuy €270